Value Creation

Why we work, who profits and what it’s all worth

In 1930, the economist John Maynard Keynes made a bold prediction in his Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. By the time his grandchildren grew up, productivity would be so high that people would work around fifteen hours a week. The rest of their time would go to leisure, art and the question of how to live well.

Productivity did rise, much as he expected. The fifteen-hour week never came.

Instead, most of us still set the alarm, commute, work, pay rent and do it all again. Value Creation has never been higher: We produce more than any generation before us, yet many feel less free, not more. So where did the surplus go? And are we running the system, or is it running us?

In short: Value is what something is worth to people, price is what the market pays for it, and between the two lies the whole question of whether we work to live or live to work.

Value Creation (15)

Value Is Not Price

Adam Smith puzzled over water and diamonds (Paradox of Value). Water keeps us alive, yet it costs almost nothing. Diamonds are nearly useless, yet they cost a fortune. Economists have long explained the paradox with scarcity, but it still points at something uncomfortable: the market measures price, not worth.

• Care work like raising children, nursing parents or comforting a friend is among the most valuable work there is. Most of it is unpaid and invisible in economic statistics.
• Essential jobs often pay the least. The pandemic showed who keeps society running: nurses, cleaners, cashiers, drivers. Their wages rarely reflect it.
• Some of the best-paid work moves money around rather than making anything new.
• Nature provides clean air, pollination and a stable climate for free, so markets tend to treat them as worthless until they’re gone.

When price and value drift apart, people start to wonder what their own work is really worth, and whether a salary says anything about them at all.

“Value has a value only if its value is valued.”

– Brian Dyson

The Golden Cage

Here’s where the critique gets sharp. In a market economy, most people own nothing to live on except their time. To eat and pay rent, they sell it. In that sense, the argument goes, we’re not free to opt out. We depend on creating value for someone else, whether we want to or not.

Karl Marx called the result alienation (Theory of Alienation). Workers, he argued, become estranged in four ways:

1. From the product, which belongs to someone else.
2. From the process, which is designed by someone else.
3. From themselves, because work stops being an expression of who they are.
4. From each other, because colleagues become competitors.

Add a growth compulsion on top: a system that must keep expanding, so it needs us to keep producing and to keep consuming what we produce. Debt keeps the wheel turning from the other side. The cage is comfortable, well lit and full of things to buy. The door is open, technically. But stepping out has a price most can’t afford.

Slavery

The metaphor has its limits, though. Calling wage labor slavery can belittle those who suffered, and still suffer, real Slavery: People owned, sold and denied any choice at all. The transatlantic slave trade alone tore more than 12 million Africans from their homes.

A worker can quit, change jobs, organize and vote. That freedom is real, even when it feels thin. For the tens of millions still trapped in forced labor today, a job they could quit would already be freedom. So the cage may be golden, but its door isn’t locked, and that difference matters.

Creating vs Extracting

Economist Mariana Mazzucato asks a sharper question than “is capitalism good or bad?” She asks who creates value and who merely captures it. A nurse, an engineer or a farmer creates value. So does an entrepreneur who solves a real problem. But some profits come from extraction: charging rent on what already exists, inflating asset prices, gaming regulation, or squeezing suppliers and workers.

When extraction is rewarded more richly than creation, the system bends. Wealth flows upward, effort and reward drift apart, and Inequities grow, not because some worked harder, but because they stood closer to the tap. That’s also where Exploitation begins: when someone’s work produces far more than they’re allowed to keep.

Inequities (10)

Exploitation

When Value Creation Means Business

Lean Management

Inside companies, value creation sounds almost innocent. In Lean Management, value is simply what the customer is willing to pay for, and everything else is waste. That definition built some of the most efficient organizations on Earth.

It’s clear, measurable and relentlessly focused on the customer, but it stays silent on who else might pay the price for all that efficiency. A process can run perfectly lean while the people inside it run on empty. Cut too much slack, and the next crisis finds no buffer left, neither in the warehouse nor in the workforce. Lean was never meant to be mean, but under pressure, the line between the two gets thin.

The open question is: Value for whom? In 1970, Milton Friedman argued that a company’s social responsibility is to increase its profits and shareholder value became the yardstick for decades (Friedman Doctrine). In 2019, nearly two hundred top US executives signed a statement saying companies should serve customers, employees, suppliers and communities too (Business Roundtable Statement). Critics say little changed in practice. Still, the question is back on the table.

What gets measured gets managed, and what doesn’t quietly becomes someone else’s cost. Value created for one group at the expense of another isn’t created at all. It’s merely moved.

The Self as Enterprise

The modern twist is that the boss has moved inside. Philosopher Byung-Chul Han argues that the old disciplinary society, with its orders and prohibitions, has turned into an achievement society. Nobody needs to drive us anymore. We drive ourselves, chasing goals, optimizing, always available, and calling it freedom.

The tools come straight from the workplace. We apply KAIZEN to our mornings, track our steps like KPIs, cut “waste” from our weekends and treat friendships like networks. Even rest gets scheduled, tracked and rated, as if recovery were just another performance metric. The same principles that create value in a factory start to wear us down when we turn them on our lives.

Burnout is what happens when the worker and the exploiter are the same person. And unlike a factory, we never close for the night: There’s always one more email to answer, one more habit to optimize, one more version of ourselves to improve. No manager could ever demand as much of us as we now demand of ourselves.

KAIZEN

And then there’s meaning. In Bullshit Jobs, anthropologist David Graeber drew on a British Survey in which more than a third of working people said their job made no meaningful contribution to the world. Many of us create value on paper while feeling we create nothing at all.

Two Views of the System

The table puts the critique and the defense side by side.

Both columns hold some truth. The interesting question is where you stand on each row.

The Case for the System

Honesty requires the other side. Two centuries ago, the vast majority of humanity lived in extreme poverty. Today it’s less than a tenth. Child mortality has fallen dramatically, life expectancy has more than doubled, and literacy has gone from rare to normal. Much of that came with markets, trade and innovation.

Adam Smith himself was no cheerleader for greed. He believed markets work best inside a moral framework of sympathy, fairness and rules. Economist Deirdre McCloskey argues that what made the modern world rich wasn’t capital alone, but a new dignity granted to ordinary people who trade, invent and improve. And the systems that tried to abolish markets entirely often built cages of their own, far less comfortable and with the door locked.

So the question may not be capitalism yes or no. It may be which kind, with which rules, and in whose service.

Beyond the Hamster Wheel

Nobody can step outside the economy alone, and most of us wouldn’t want to. But we can change our relationship with it:

1. Ask who benefits. For every job, project or purchase: who creates the value here, and who captures it?
2. Count the invisible. Care, friendship, volunteering and rest are value too, even if no invoice shows it.
3. Separate worth from wage. Your salary is a market price, not a verdict on you as a person.
4. Define enough. Without a sense of enough, every raise just becomes the new baseline.
5. Choose where you add value. Where you can, put your time into work that creates rather than extracts.
6. Slow Down. Not as a productivity hack, but as a reminder that you’re more than your output.

We are not slaves of the system. But we’re not its masters either, until we decide what we’re working for.

Conclusion

Value creation is how humanity turned scarcity into abundance, and it’s also how many people came to feel like gears in a machine they never chose. Both are true. The market is a brilliant tool for coordinating what we make, but a poor judge of what matters. The trouble starts when we let it define our worth, our time and our sense of meaning. The challenge for Our Society isn’t to stop creating value. It’s to remember who it’s for. And for each of us, it’s to stop asking only how much we’re worth, and start asking what’s worth our life. That’s a question of Meaning / Purpose, and no market can answer it for us. Whose approval we’re chasing along the way is a question for Validation.

Our Society (12)

Meaning / Purpose

Validation

What’s More

My Blog

My Interests

My Quotes

The posts in My Blog feature reflective, story-driven pieces rooted in personal and societal insights. The topics in My Interests explore abstract, philosophical ideas and their cultural and social impact. The lines in My Quotes share brief reflections that highlight clear insights shaped by lived experience. Subscribe to get Site Updates and be notified whenever new content is published.